A test for monotone comparative statics
In this paper we design an econometric test for monotone comparative statics (MCS) often found in models with multiple equilibria. Our test exploits the observable implications of the MCS prediction: that the extreme (high and low) conditional quantiles of the dependent variable increase monotonically with the explanatory variable. The main contribution of the paper is to derive a likelihoodratio test, which to the best of our knowledge, is the first econometric test of MCS proposed in the literature. The test is an asymptotic â€œchi-bar squaredâ€ test for order restrictions on intermediate conditional quantiles. The key features of our approach are: (1) it does not require estimating the underlying nonparametric model relating the dependent and explanatory variables to the latent disturbances; (2) it makes few assumptions on the cardinality, location or probabilities over equilibria. In particular, one can implement our test without assuming an equilibrium selection rule.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
|Date of creation:||Sep 2007|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Working Paper Assistant, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 228-77, Caltech, Pasadena CA 91125|
Phone: 626 395-4065
Fax: 626 405-9841
Web page: http://www.hss.caltech.edu/ss
|Order Information:|| Postal: Working Paper Assistant, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 228-77, Caltech, Pasadena CA 91125|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clt:sswopa:1278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Victoria Mason)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.