IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Free Market Access For Ldcs Under The Eba Initiative. An Empirical Analysis Using The Gravity Approach

Listed author(s):
  • Francesco Aiello


  • Paola Cardamone


    (Dipartimento di Economia e Statistica, Università della Calabria)

This paper assesses the effectiveness of the Everything But Arms (EBA) initiative launched by the EU in 2001. It evaluates whether EBA was effective in increasing the exports from LDCs to the EU over the period 1995-2006. After arguing that the impact of trade preferences should be estimated by using disaggregated trade flows rather than aggregated trade, the analysis is carried out by considering five products (cloves, coffee, crustaceans, molluscs and vanilla beans) which meet three selecting criteria related to the export intensity of EBA countries, to the real/actual preferences of EBA and to the intra-year distribution of EU tariffs. Furthermore, the exports share of the 5-selected goods with respect to national exports is never marginal and, in many cases, is higher than 60%. From an econometric perspective, we improve the reliability of results by giving more attention to the econometric setting and to measurement of the preferential treatment. The evidence is mixed and while this limits the possibility to draw a general conclusion about the role of EBA, it supports the decision to work using disaggregated data because the evidence provided allows us to gauge the sector specificities which would be hidden when analysing total trade. Results show a positive impact on the exports of crustaceans and vanilla of the preferential treatment granted by the EU under EBA, whereas the evidence is un-conclusive when considering the other three products.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 2010-04
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania" - DESF in its series Working Papers with number 201008.

in new window

Length: 28 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2010
Handle: RePEc:clb:wpaper:201008
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania", Ponte Pietro Bucci, Cubo 0/C, I-87036 Arcavacata di Rende, CS, Italy

Phone: +39 0984 492413
Fax: +39 0984 492421
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clb:wpaper:201008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Giovanni Dodero)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.