Author
Listed:
- David Boisclair
- Raquel Fonseca
- Pierre-Carl Michaud
- Gäelle Simard-Duplain
- Pierre-Yves Yanni
Abstract
Any effort to provide income support must come to terms with an impossible trinity: It cannot simultaneously be generous to those with the greatest need (without employment income), be affordable for public finances, and incentivize work. It is impossible to achieve all these goals at once, so a difficult balancing act is required. For example, a study by Godbout and St-Cerny reveals that the measures undertaken in response to the pandemic have had the impact of increasing theeffective income floor in Quebec for low earners. They point out potentially detrimental impacts on the incentive to work. In recent years the idea of a guaranteed minimum income has received considerable attention, and the response to the pandemic has, in effect, amounted to something like a guaranteed minimum income, especially the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and its student edition, the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB). For example, CERB benefits for those without employment income are quite generous, but since they are only available to workers earning less that $1000 / month they may create a disincentiv to resuming work or to increasing the number of hours worked to a level that would raise earnings above $1000 per month. On top of these benefits there are enhancements to the GST Credit and the Canada Child Benefit, as well as measures like Quebec’s Incentive Program to Retain Essential Workers (IPREW). While several indices suggest that these supplements to the social safety net could create a disincentive to work, our team wanted to conduct an analysis that integrated these programs into the income taxes paid by Quebeckers (both provincial and federal), so as to compute measures of incentivization having broad recognition among economists, the effective marginal tax rate (EMTR) and its little brother, the participation tax rate (PTR). Also, it is worth looking at the ramifications of these new programs for the cost of existing programs. In this note we present an illustrative case study to tide us over pending more detailed analyses currently underway.
Suggested Citation
David Boisclair & Raquel Fonseca & Pierre-Carl Michaud & Gäelle Simard-Duplain & Pierre-Yves Yanni, 2020.
"Do we Need to Take Another Look at Income Support? Impacts on the Incentive to Work,"
CIRANO Papers
2020pe-23, CIRANO.
Handle:
RePEc:cir:circah:2020pe-23
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:circah:2020pe-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.