IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A Robust, Uniformly Most Powerful Unit Root Test

Listed author(s):
  • Jeffrey A. Mills


Registered author(s):

    Mills (2008) examines an alternative procedure for testing precise hypotheses based on specifying a set of precise alternative hypotheses. Mills shows that this method resolves several problems with the standard procedure, particularly the Jeffreys-Lindley-Bartlett paradox, and has desirable properties. This paper applies this new testing procedure to the unit root hypothesis for an AR(1) model. A Monte Carlo simulation experiment is conducted to study the performance of the test in terms of robustness to the specification of the prior distribution. The resulting new test is compared with the best alternatives, namely the tests of Conigliani and Spezzaferri (2007) and Elliot, Rothenberg and Stock (1996).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Cincinnati, Department of Economics in its series University of Cincinnati, Economics Working Papers Series with number 2009-02.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2009
    Date of revision: 2009
    Handle: RePEc:cin:ucecwp:2009-02
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Cincinnati, OH 45221-0371

    Phone: (513) 556-2670
    Fax: (513) 556-2669
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cin:ucecwp:2009-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sourushe Zandvakili)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.