IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cie/wpaper/9502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Welfare of Alternative Equilibrium Paths in the Kiyotaki-Wright Model

Author

Listed:
  • Juan M. Romero

    (Departamento de Economia, Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico (ITAM))

Abstract

I provide new existence and welfare results for the Kiyotaki-Wright model (JPE, 1989). Previous work on the model has focused almost exclusively on steady-states and has established the existence of multiple steady-states. Moreover, welfare comparisons among steady-states are of dubious significance because transitions are ignored. For mixed strategies that restrict agents to play a unique strategy for each opportunity set (which as shown in Kehoe-Kiyotaki-Wright (ET, 1993) implies that the number of steady-state is generically finite). I prove that there exists an equilibrium in which the most costly to-store good has the highest acceptance rate. Furthermore, this equilibrium Pareto dominates equilibria in which less costly to- store goods are universally accepted. I also display multiple equilibria in which only pure strategies are played. Among these is one in which the universally accepted good is the least costly to-store and another in which the universally accepted good is the second least costly to-store. For some initial conditions both exist and the latter is better according to a representative-agent-type welfare criterion. Thus, my results show (1) that there often exist equilibria in which objects with poor storage properties are widely accepted and (2) that these equilibria have good welfare properties in relation to those in which better objects are widely accepted.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan M. Romero, 1995. "Welfare of Alternative Equilibrium Paths in the Kiyotaki-Wright Model," Working Papers 9502, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM.
  • Handle: RePEc:cie:wpaper:9502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cie:wpaper:9502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diego Dominguez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciitamx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.