IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chy/respap/14chedp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A cost-benefit study of geriatric-orthopaedic management of patients with fractured neck of femur

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Fordham
  • Ruth Thompson
  • Julie Holmes
  • Catherine Hodkinson

Abstract

Having identified woman over 65 with the condition, fractured neck of femur, as the main cause of slow throughput and low bed availability on the acute orthopaedic wards at Huddersfield, it was decided to review existing management policies towards this group of patients. After consultation with the Orthopaedic and Geriatric Specialties, it was decided that a possible means of improving throughput was to instigate a policy of joint Geriatric-Orthopaedic management for these patients. It was envisaged that this scheme might also improve the quality of care and therefore the outcome of treatment. Six orthopaedic rehabilitation beds at St. Luke's, a mainly long stay hospital, three miles from the District General Hospital (DGH) were converted into Geriatric-Orthopaedic beds. This site at the time was the main base for the district Geriatric Servicec as well as providing some Orthopaedic rehabilitation beds. A standardised format of Geriatric-Orthopaedic management was agreed between the two specialties. Patients admitted with this condition admitted during the course of the year commencing March 1984, were then randomly assigned by the research team, to either the new joint management sustem or to single speciality Orthopaedic management as before. The evaluative criteria on which the two systems were judged can be divided into two main categories, namely costs (to the Hospital sector) and benefits (to the individla patients and to the Hospital sector). Costs taken into consideration included the number of bed days utilised (as a general indicator of fixed costs) and staff input into rehabilitation, e.g. physiotherapist's, occupational therapist's, social worker's time (as indicators of variable costs). Benefit, or outcome of treatment, was measured by the availability of patients in the trial to undertake standard 'activities of daily living' tests (ADLs) at fixed intervals up to and including discharge (e.g. patients' ability to stand, dress, etc.). Outcome was also measured in terms of a therapist's prognosis and success in returning patients back to their home environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Fordham & Ruth Thompson & Julie Holmes & Catherine Hodkinson, 1986. "A cost-benefit study of geriatric-orthopaedic management of patients with fractured neck of femur," Working Papers 014chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:14chedp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/CHE%20Discussion%20Paper%2014.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1986
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    geriatric; orthopaedic;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:14chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gill Forder (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.