IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chy/respap/117chedp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Costing practice nurses: implications for primary health care

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Atkin
  • Michael Hirst

Abstract

General medical practice has changed significantly in the past ten years, reflecting a range of innovations giving greater priority to health prevention and promotion and to primary health care generally. One consequence has been a rapid increase in the number of practice nurses. Since 1988 the number of whole-time equivalents has trebled and most practices now employ at least one nurse. Practice nurses make an increasingly important contribution to both the practice team and the delivery of primary health care. They undertake a wide range of activities, in the practice and the patient’s home, including traditional nursing tasks, chronic disease management, health promotion, new patient registration health checks, counselling, advice, investigation, treatment and health assessments of elderly people. There is, however, widespread uncertainty about their role and how it might develop. Cost has been largely ignored because where the money comes from, that is who bears the cost of practice nurses, is to a great extent divorced from the responsibility for their employment. General medical practitioners who employ nurses are usually reimbursed by Family Health Service Authorities for most of the nurse’s salary. This paper provides unit cost estimates of practice nurses and discusses the implications for their future role and deployment. As well as direct costs, it considers the wider opportunity cost associated with the growth in practice nurse numbers.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Atkin & Michael Hirst, 1994. "Costing practice nurses: implications for primary health care," Working Papers 117chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:117chedp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/CHE%20Discussion%20Paper%20117.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1994
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Hartley & Leigh Goodwin, 1985. "The exchequer costs of nurse training," Working Papers 006chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Leigh Goodwin & Bosanquet, 1986. "Nurses and higher education: the costs of change," Working Papers 013chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Nick Bosanquet & Richard Jeavons, 1989. "The future structure of nurse education: an appraisal of policy options at the local level," Working Papers 054chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:117chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gill Forder (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chyoruk.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.