Author
Listed:
- Baiba Renerte
(University of Zurich - Department of Finance)
- Malte Baader
(University of Zurich - Department Finance)
- Carmen Tanner
(University of Zurich - Department of Finance; Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen)
- Alexander F. Wagner
(University of Zurich - Department of Finance; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Swiss Finance Institute)
- Nicole Witt
(Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen)
Abstract
Organizations are investing increasing effort and resources into supporting ethical decisionmaking among employees. One common approach involves the use of "contemplation questions" (CQs) - simple, reflective prompts designed to encourage thoughtful consideration of ethical challenges. In this study, we compile a unique dataset on CQ usage among the world's largest companies and find that at least 35% of Fortune Global 200 companies and 59% of S&P 200 companies employ CQs. An analysis of 727 CQs reveals significant variation across regions and industries. Based on an employee survey, we propose a classification of CQs according to the normative references they invoke, resulting in five categories: Law and Reputation, Company Policies and Culture, Universal Principles, Self, and Peers. We find that companies favor CQs focused on legal and organizational norms, whereas employees rate questions appealing to universal principles and personal values as more useful - indicating a potential mismatch between corporate practices and employee preferences and motivating future research on behavioral effectiveness.
Suggested Citation
Baiba Renerte & Malte Baader & Carmen Tanner & Alexander F. Wagner & Nicole Witt, 2025.
"Organizational Ethics in Action: The Use of Contemplation Questions as Decision Aids in Large Companies,"
Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series
25-103, Swiss Finance Institute.
Handle:
RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp25103
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp25103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.