IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp0925.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Portfolio Choice and Asset Pricing with Narrow Framing and Probability Weighting

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico G. DE GIORGI

    (University of St. Gallen, Swiss Finance Institute and University of Lugano)

  • Shane LEGG

    (University College London and University of Lugano)

Abstract

This paper extends the model with narrow framing suggested by Barberis and Huang (2009) to also account for probability weighting and a convex-concave value function in the specification of cumulative prospect theory preferences on narrowly framed assets. We show that probability weighting is needed in order that investors reduce their holding of narrowly framed risky assets in the presence of negative skewness and high Sharpe ratios, which are typ- ical characteristics of stock index returns. The model with framing and probability weighting can thus explain the stock participation puzzle under realistic assumptions on stock market returns. We also show that a convex-concave value function generates wealth effects that are consistent with empirical observations on stock market participation. Finally, we address the asset pricing implications of probability weighting in the model with narrow framing and show that in the case of negative skewness the equity premium of narrowly framed assets is much higher than when probability weighting is not taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico G. DE GIORGI & Shane LEGG, 2009. "Dynamic Portfolio Choice and Asset Pricing with Narrow Framing and Probability Weighting," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 09-25, Swiss Finance Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp0925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1413087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Narrow framing; cumulative prospect theory; probability weighting function; negative skewness; simulation methods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp0925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.