IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Un Test Conjunto de Superioridad Predictiva para los Pronósticos de Inflación Chilena


  • Pablo Pincheira B.


Optimality under quadratic loss implies that forecasts built using a large information set should perform al least as well as forecasts built using a more restricted and nested information set. In this article we use a joint test of superior predictive ability to test this optimality condition for the term structure of several Chilean inflation forecasts coming from the following sources: Bloomberg, Consensus Economics, the Survey of Professional Forecasters and an average of selected seasonal univariate models. We do this by taking advantage of the fact that these sets of forecasts are built at different moments in time and, more importantly, using different and nested information sets. Our results indicate that the null hypothesis of optimality under quadratic loss cannot be rejected when Mean Squared Error is used to evaluate the term structure of the forecasts. Nevertheless, when the joint test is carried out to evaluate the term structure of the Mean Squared Forecasts, as suggested by Patton and Timmermann (2010), the joint test rejects the null hypothesis of optimality. Further analysis of our results reveals that this rejection is associated with a violation of an orthogonality condition that should be satisfied when forecasts are optimal. Moreover, this violation seems to stand both across different sources of forecasts and across different forecasting horizons. This suggests that there is room for improvement in the term structure of Chilean inflation forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Pincheira B., 2011. "Un Test Conjunto de Superioridad Predictiva para los Pronósticos de Inflación Chilena," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 620, Central Bank of Chile.
  • Handle: RePEc:chb:bcchwp:620

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chb:bcchwp:620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Claudio Sepulveda). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.