IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgm/wpaper/37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bureaupreneurs in China: We Did It Our Way, a Comparative Study of the Explanation of the Economic Successes of Townvillage-Enterprises in China

Author

Listed:
  • Boudewijn Bouckaert

    (Centre for Advanced Studies in Law and Economics, University of Ghent)

Abstract

This article explores the different and sometimes conflicting explanations of the success of the collective enterprises (town-village-enterprise) in China during the first phase of transition (1979-1995). It is argued that explanations, relying on cultural variables are not sustainable and this for two reasons. First, the importance of the collective enterprise is shrinking while the private sector is clearly on the rise. Second, other factors, referring to characteristics of the local and central political, administrative and economic environment, in which the Chinese enterprise has to (had to?) operate, provide for a sufficient explanation of the peculiar structure of the Chinese collective enterprises. These enterprises are seen as the result of ‘bureau-preneurship’ because local bureaucrats were integrated in their management in order to pre-empt predatory behaviour and to facilitate the relationships with the central institutions. The article contributes to the property rights’ theory of the firm as it analyses an empirically very important case in which firms with unclear property rights and structures, apparently not conducive for incentives, might still be the most efficient option.

Suggested Citation

  • Boudewijn Bouckaert, 2006. "Bureaupreneurs in China: We Did It Our Way, a Comparative Study of the Explanation of the Economic Successes of Townvillage-Enterprises in China," CAE Working Papers 37, Aix-Marseille Université, CERGAM.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgm:wpaper:37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://junon.u-3mrs.fr/afa10w21/RePEc/cgm/wpaper/DR_37_0506_bouckaert.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2006
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Nirvikar, 2007. "Fiscal Decentralization in China and India: Competitive, Cooperative or Market Preserving Federalism?," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt76d8b4hm, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgm:wpaper:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mathieu Bédard (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caam3fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.