Author
Listed:
- Maxim Sharakin Fedorov
(Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore)
- Akhil Bansal
(Center for Global Development
London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust)
- Georgia Bradley
(Dartmouth College)
- Daniel Chong
(Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore)
- Yasir Bin Nisar
(Department of Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization)
- Edwine Barasa
(Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford)
- Yah Ru Juang
(Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore)
- Teerawat Wiwatpanit
(Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand)
- Siriyada Kitbamrung
(Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand)
- Nga Man Juliana Lui
(Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong)
- Xue Li
(Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
Department of Medicine, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital)
- Yi Wang
(Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore)
Abstract
Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The current diagnostic standard, blood culture, has long turnaround times and high infrastructure requirements, limiting its utility. Consequently, clinicians rely on non-specific clinical signs for initial management. To address this unmet need, the WHO published a 2025 Target Product Profile (TPP) for rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs). We developed a global expert-validated model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a TPP-compliant POCT in LMICs. A decision tree compared a TPP-compliant POCT integrated into standard of care (SOC) against SOC alone from a healthcare system perspective over a lifetime horizon. The model evaluated infants (0–59 days) with possible serious bacterial infection across facility-of-birth and community-presenting cohorts. Outcomes included incremental cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. Probabilistic and threshold sensitivity analyses assessed parameter uncertainty. At a US$ 5·00 unit price, the POCT reduced costs by US$ 37 342 and averted 206 DALYs per 1 000 facility-of-birth patients compared to SOC. In community-presenting patients, it reduced costs by US$ 5 715 and averted 127 DALYs per 1 000. The POCT was dominant in 93·2% (facility) and 84·8% (community) of probabilistic iterations. Results remained robust across wide-ranging epidemiological and cost inputs. These findings provide an evidence base supporting prioritised investment in developing a TPP-compliant POCT to improve neonatal sepsis management in LMICs.
Suggested Citation
Maxim Sharakin Fedorov & Akhil Bansal & Georgia Bradley & Daniel Chong & Yasir Bin Nisar & Edwine Barasa & Yah Ru Juang & Teerawat Wiwatpanit & Siriyada Kitbamrung & Nga Man Juliana Lui & Xue Li & Yi , 2026.
"Cost-Effectiveness of a Target Point-of-Care Triage Test for Neonatal Sepsis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries,"
Working Papers
744, Center for Global Development.
Handle:
RePEc:cgd:wpaper:744
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.