IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/wpaper/659.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unequal Households or Communities? Explaining Nutritional Inequality in South Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Caitlin Brown

    (Department of Economics, University of Manchester)

  • Eeshani Kandpal

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Jean Lee

    (South Asia Chief Economist’s Office, World Bank)

  • Anaise Williams

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

Abstract

Using DHS data for South Asia, we find that most undernourished individuals are not found in wealth-poor households. They are also not typically found in the same households: 40 percent of households have differing nutritional status among members, and 66 percent of undernourished individuals reside in households with members who are not undernourished. However, household-level factors such as wealth and infrastructure are also at play. Between-household and within-community inequality represents a relatively larger portion of total inequality in undernutrition; however, average community-level undernourishment is generally low. Given these heterogeneities, accurately reaching undernourished individuals through targeted policy is likely to be difficult. While simple categorical targeting metrics such as age or access to sanitation infrastructure does as well as household wealth-based targeting, all targeting methods considered yield large inclusion and exclusion errors, raising questions as to whether nutrition interventions should be targeted.

Suggested Citation

  • Caitlin Brown & Eeshani Kandpal & Jean Lee & Anaise Williams, 2023. "Unequal Households or Communities? Explaining Nutritional Inequality in South Asia," Working Papers 659, Center for Global Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/unequal-households-or-communities-explaining-nutritional-inequality-south-asia?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Undernutrition; stunting; wasting; household wealth; intra-household inequality; targeting; Demographic and Health Surveys; South Asia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.