IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/wpaper/228.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Where Have All the Donors Gone? Scarce Donor Funding for Non-Communicable Diseases - Working Paper 228

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel A. Nugent Andrea B. Feigl

Abstract

Health conditions in developing countries are becoming more like those in developed countries, with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) predominating and infectious diseases declining. The increased awareness of changing health needs, however, has not translated into significant shifts in resource or policy-level attention from international donors or governments in affected countries. Driven by changes in lifestyle related to nutrition, physical activity, and smoking, the surging burden of NCDs in poor countries portends painful choices, particularly for countries with weak health systems that are struggling to manage persistent infectious diseases burdens and to protect the poor from excessive out-of-pocket expenses. Global development assistance for health (DAH) was estimated at $21.8 billion in 2007 (Ravishankar et al., 2009). A recent assessment shows that official development assistance for health reached $26.4 billion in 2008, surpassing all prior years (Kates et al., 2010). No specific mention is made of DAH for NCDs in developing countries in either study. This paper aims to fill that gap. We conducted an analysis of donor spending on NCDs in developing countries from 2001 to 2008 that reveals that less than 3 percent ($503 million out of $22 billion) of overall DAH was dedicated to NCDs in 2007. The amount of donor assistance for health rose to $686 million in 2008. In terms of the burden of disease, dnors provided about $0.78/DALY attributable to NCDs in developing countries in 2007, compared to $23.9/DALY aatributal to HIV, TB, and malaria. If donors provided just half the support ot avoid NCD DALYs that they provide to the three infectious diseases, it would amount to almost $4 billion in DAH for NCDs. The picture of donor involvement in NCDs is not entirely bleak. Donor funding to developing countries for NCDs grew by 618 percent between 2001 and 2008, with the largest increase coming from private, nonprofit donors, and evidence of accelerating interest from bilateral donors. Multilateral organizations remain the largest category of funders. Nonetheless additional donors funding is needed to support developing-country efforts to incorporate NCDs into their existing health care programs through such mechanisms as hypertension and career screening and prevention programs, and proven policy solutions such as tobacco taxation and salt reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel A. Nugent Andrea B. Feigl, 2010. "Where Have All the Donors Gone? Scarce Donor Funding for Non-Communicable Diseases - Working Paper 228," Working Papers 228, Center for Global Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/1424546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Lloyd-Sherlock & Nadia Minicuci & Barbara Corso & John Beard & Somnath Chatterji & Shah Ebrahim, 2017. "Diseases of the Rich? The Social Patterning of Hypertension in Six Low- and Middle-Income Countries," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(4), pages 827-842, August.
    2. Victoria Menil, 2015. "Missed Opportunities in Global Health: Identifying New Strategies to Improve Mental Health in LMICs," Working Papers id:7987, eSocialSciences.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Global Health Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:wpaper:228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.