IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cgd/ppaper/183.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

COVID-19 Vaccine Predictions: Using Mathematical Modelling and Expert Opinions to Estimate Timelines and Probabilities of Success of COVID-19 Vaccines

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony McDonnell

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Robert Van Exan

    (Immunization Policy and Knowledge Translation)

  • Steve Lloyd

    (Queen Mary University of London)

  • Laura Subramanian

    (Ariadne Labs)

  • Kalipso Chalkidou

    (Center for Global Development)

  • Adrian La Porta

    (Bryden Wood)

  • Jiabin Li

    (Bryden Wood)

  • Eddine Maiza

    (Independent)

  • David Reader

    (Bryden Wood)

  • Julie Rosenberg

    (Ariadne Labs)

  • Jack Scannell

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Vaughan Thomas

    (Tillingbourne Consulting and University College London)

  • Rebecca Weintraub

    (Ariadne Labs)

  • Prashant Yadav

    (Center for Global Development
    INSEAD)

Abstract

We collected publicly available information, interviewed experts, and used our diverse range of expertise to analyse and model the COVID-19 vaccine portfolio. There is significant uncertainty surrounding the development, approval and manufacturing of COVID-19 vaccines. We find that the chances of developing a safe and efficacious vaccine are high but it will not occur in the immediate future, and it is unlikely to be the silver bullet that resolves the pandemic and returns our world to normal. Using inputs generated from expert interviews, our modelling suggests that there is a 50 percent chance that by the end of April 2021 there will be a vaccine safe and efficacious enough to win approval from a stringent regulator; by the end of 2021, this rises to 85 percent. Inputs more optimistic or pessimistic than those we gained through expert interviews lead to very different results. We also modelled how long it would take to manufacture COVID-19 vaccines once they are approved. Our modelling suggests that it will probably take more than a year to produce enough vaccines to inoculate the world’s 50 million medical staff, and that it could be September 2023 before we have enough doses for the whole world. It is not clear that these early vaccines will be efficacious enough to end the COVID-19 crisis. The vast majority of experts we spoke with predict that first-generation vaccines will not be effective enough to end the pandemic on their own, and that it will take longer to develop vaccines that fully prevent infection. This means that the world must be prepared to commit to other public health measures to control the spread of the virus for years, and should invest in a wider, more diversified portfolio of vaccines through better international collaboration and market incentives, as well as focus on diagnostics and treatments. All this while carefully managing the collateral damage from the ongoing policy response.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony McDonnell & Robert Van Exan & Steve Lloyd & Laura Subramanian & Kalipso Chalkidou & Adrian La Porta & Jiabin Li & Eddine Maiza & David Reader & Julie Rosenberg & Jack Scannell & Vaughan Thomas, 2020. "COVID-19 Vaccine Predictions: Using Mathematical Modelling and Expert Opinions to Estimate Timelines and Probabilities of Success of COVID-19 Vaccines," Policy Papers 183, Center for Global Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:cgd:ppaper:183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cgdev.org/publication/covid-19-vaccine-predictions?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cgd:ppaper:183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cgdevus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.