IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ceu/econwp/2013_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Endogenous Market Power in an Emissions Trading Scheme with Auctioning

Author

Listed:
  • Corina Haita

Abstract

This paper contributes to the literature in market power for emissions permits, modeling an emissions trading scheme in which polluters differ only in their business-as-usual emissions. They play a two-stage static complete information game in which their market power arises endogenously from the business-as-usual emissions. In the first stage the polluters bid in an auction for the distribution of the fixed supply of permits and in the second stage they trade these permits in a secondary market. For compliance, they can also engage in abatement activity at a quadratic cost. In equilibrium all polluters are successful in the auction. In the secondary market the low emitters are net sellers and the high emitters are net buyers. Moreover, the secondary market price is unambiguously above the auction clearing price. The welfare analysis shows that the aggregate compliance cost when polluters act strategically increases in the heterogeneity of their business-as-usual emissions. Furthermore, there exists a threshold of the fixed supply of permits above which strategic behavior is socially preferable. Finally, for certain distributions of the business-as-usual emissions, strategic behavior is cost-effective, regardless of the level of the available supply of permits.

Suggested Citation

  • Corina Haita, 2013. "Endogenous Market Power in an Emissions Trading Scheme with Auctioning," CEU Working Papers 2013_3, Department of Economics, Central European University, revised 30 Jul 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:ceu:econwp:2013_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ceu-economics-and-business.github.io/RePEc/pdf/2013_3.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ceu-economics-and-business.github.io/RePEc/pdf/2013_3_revised.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ceu:econwp:2013_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Apor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deceuat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.