IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Divided City? The value of mixed communities in expensive neighbourhoods


  • Katie Bates
  • Laura Lane
  • Anne Power
  • Nicola Serle


Headlines: [1] Octavia Housing, a long-established social landlord in Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster, provides low cost rented homes to low-income local residents in high-cost areas. In doing so it helps to overcome deep social divisions. [2] Octavia's rents are far lower than local private rents and offer tenants security and a sense of belonging. Octavia tenants pay around £120 a week, significantly lower than private rents in our case study areas. Tenants generally are happy with their neighbourhoods and they like living where they do. [3] Most Octavia tenants have lived in these areas for a long time - some all their lives - and long before they became so expensive. They feel part of the area where they live. [4] Low-income tenants identify many benefits from living in mixed neighbourhoods alongside people on much higher incomes. Schools, parks and amenities earn praise. [5] Almost all tenants believe that social housing in expensive areas is vital to retaining a social mix and building an inclusive society. They think their children benefit from attending schools in these areas and aspire higher as a result. Tenants worry that moving to other cheaper areas would damage their work chances and their children's education. They would lose local support. They think poorer areas have more social problems. [6] Tenants are worried about their future, which they feel is threatened by gentrification and wider economic conditions. They also worry that public spending cuts and loss of services and support is making their lives more precarious. Tenants' biggest fear is that little will be left for their children and grandchildren in the way of jobs and housing.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie Bates & Laura Lane & Anne Power & Nicola Serle, 2013. "Divided City? The value of mixed communities in expensive neighbourhoods," CASE Reports casereport77, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:sticar:casereport77

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    social housing; Octavia Housing; social mix; social landlords; mixed neighbourhoods;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:sticar:casereport77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.