IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/sticab/casebrief40.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Little fish, big streams: How do early in-class maths ‘ability’-groups and early teacher judgements relate to primary school children’s later maths self-concept?

Author

Listed:
  • Tammy Campbell

Abstract

This paper summarises research examining predictors of primary school children's maths self-concept at age 11. It finds that the in-class 'ability' group children were placed in four years earlier, at age seven, strongly relates to whether they later think they are good at maths. Teachers' beliefs about the children at age seven are also strongly associated with later children's maths self-concept. These patterns hold even when accounting for a range of factors, including children's maths skills as measured at seven. Associations are more pervasive and complex for girls.

Suggested Citation

  • Tammy Campbell, 2021. "Little fish, big streams: How do early in-class maths ‘ability’-groups and early teacher judgements relate to primary school children’s later maths self-concept?," CASE Briefs casebrief40, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:sticab:casebrief40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cb/casebrief40.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Self-concept; Maths; Gender; Ability?-grouping; Teacher judgements; Millennium Cohort Study;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:sticab:casebrief40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/case/_new/publications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.