IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/spccrn/008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hard Times, New Directions? The Impact of Local Government Spending Cuts in London (Interim Report Summary)

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Fitzgerald
  • Ruth Lupton

Abstract

Key Points: London local government has taken a 33 per cent real terms cut in service funding from central government between 2009/10 and 2013/14. Councils have been making strenuous efforts to make large savings without cutting front line services, and to protect services for those who need them most. Most savings have come through efficiencies, the sorts of savings which Councils have argued are neither detrimental to, nor noticeable at, the frontline. However, Councils have, reluctantly, had to reduce their own role in the provision of discretionary services. More of these services are being delivered by voluntary and community sector partners, so the landscape of local service provision has seen some change. The need for Councils to pare their own provision back to statutory services, increasingly targeting those most in need, may, ultimately, result in less local variation rather than more. In this the cuts could be running counter to the promotion of the localism agenda. A focus on the most in need, seen in greater targeting of services, could also further fuel rising demand, as lower level need goes unaddressed. Council officers and Members are concerned that the 'limits of efficiency' have been reached, and there is little scope for further large-scale savings without significant effects on frontline services.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2014. "Hard Times, New Directions? The Impact of Local Government Spending Cuts in London (Interim Report Summary)," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Research Note 008, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:spccrn:008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/rn008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regions and area inequalities; cities; london; area inequalities; social policy; inner london; outer london; london local government; metropolitan governance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:spccrn:008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/case/_new/publications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.