IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepops/70.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mapping Functions for Wellbeing Measures to Generate WELLBYs for Use in Economic Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Parkes

Abstract

Ideally, outcome measurements for interventions that affect wellbeing would report the standard, ONS recommended, life satisfaction question. Responses to this question directly correspond to WELLBYs, which can be monetised in policy appraisal following the UK Treasury's Green Book Supplementary Guidance. In this instance, the wellbeing impacts of a given policy are clear. However, while this form of social cost benefit analysis is still developing, measurement of life satisfaction often does not take place. In the absence of a universal wellbeing measure in policy, a host of other metrics and indices are collected, capturing similar concepts relating to wellbeing or health. To monetise wellbeing benefits in these cases, there is a need to map these indicators onto WELLBYs. This paper estimates mapping functions which translate common wellbeing measures into WELLBYs. It provides mapping functions for the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), Short-form Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (S-WEMWBS), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - Internalising Scale (SDQ-I), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 (GAD-7).

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Parkes, 2025. "Mapping Functions for Wellbeing Measures to Generate WELLBYs for Use in Economic Evaluation," CEP Occasional Papers 70, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepops:70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/occasional/op070.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Kearns & Roberta Ara & Allan Wailoo & Andrea Manca & Monica Alava & Keith Abrams & Mike Campbell, 2013. "Good Practice Guidelines for the use of Statistical Regression Models in Economic Evaluations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 643-652, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mona Aghdaee & Bonny Parkinson & Kompal Sinha & Yuanyuan Gu & Rajan Sharma & Emma Olin & Henry Cutler, 2022. "An examination of machine learning to map non‐preference based patient reported outcome measures to health state utility values," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1525-1557, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wellbeing; Value for Money; WELLBY;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepops:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/occasional-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.