IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/26-59.html

Store Inventory Positioning, E-Commerce Intensity, and Retailer Profitability: Evidence From U.S. Census Microdata

Author

Listed:
  • Cuneyt Eroglu
  • Christian Hofer
  • Adriana Rossiter Hofer

Abstract

Problem definition: Retailers increasingly sell both in physical stores and via e-commerce channels. In this setting, a central yet underexplored strategic decision concerns store inventory positioning (SIP)—the share of total inventory held in stores rather than in upstream facilities—and its effect on firm performance. While classical inventory theory highlights a cost–responsiveness tradeoff associated with SIP, little empirical evidence exists on how SIP affects retailer profitability in a multi-channel context. This study investigates how SIP relates to operating margins and how this relationship varies with retailers’ e-commerce intensity (ECI), the share of total sales facilitated via online channels. We also explore whether these effects are contingent on factors like retailer size and type. Methodology/results: We use restricted-access firm-level microdata from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Annual Retail Trade Survey covering approximately 42,500 U.S. retailers and 190,000 firm-year observations from 2006 to 2019. The data uniquely allows us to observe both the physical location of inventory and e-commerce sales shares. Using two-way fixed effects models complemented by robustness analyses, we find that higher SIP is, on average, negatively associated with operating margins. However, this negative relationship is significantly attenuated as ECI increases. Importantly, the moderating effect of ECI is economically large and statistically significant only for large retailers and is strongest for specialty-oriented retailers relative to convenience-oriented ones. Managerial implications: Our findings show that SIP is not universally beneficial; its profitability implications depend critically on a retailer’s channel mix, scale, and type. Accordingly, managers should align inventory placement decisions with their ECI, size, and type. For large retailers with substantial online sales, greater store-based inventory can enhance operating margins, whereas smaller or convenience-oriented retailers may be better served by more centralized inventory holdings.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuneyt Eroglu & Christian Hofer & Adriana Rossiter Hofer, 2026. "Store Inventory Positioning, E-Commerce Intensity, and Retailer Profitability: Evidence From U.S. Census Microdata," Working Papers 26-59, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:26-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2026/adrm/ces/CES-WP-26-59.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:26-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dawn Anderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.