IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/18-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Squeezing More Out of Your Data: Business Record Linkage with Python

Author

Listed:
  • John Cuffe
  • Nathan Goldschlag

Abstract

Integrating data from different sources has become a fundamental component of modern data analytics. Record linkage methods represent an important class of tools for accomplishing such integration. In the absence of common disambiguated identifiers, researchers often must resort to ''fuzzy" matching, which allows imprecision in the characteristics used to identify common entities across dfferent datasets. While the record linkage literature has identified numerous individually useful fuzzy matching techniques, there is little consensus on a way to integrate those techniques within a single framework. To this end, we introduce the Multiple Algorithm Matching for Better Analytics (MAMBA), an easy-to-use, flexible, scalable, and transparent software platform for business record linkage applications using Census microdata. MAMBA leverages multiple string comparators to assess the similarity of records using a machine learning algorithm to disambiguate matches. This software represents a transparent tool for researchers seeking to link external business data to the Census Business Register files.

Suggested Citation

  • John Cuffe & Nathan Goldschlag, 2018. "Squeezing More Out of Your Data: Business Record Linkage with Python," Working Papers 18-46, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:18-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/ces/wp/2018/CES-WP-18-46.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Tancredi & Brunero Liseo, 2015. "Regression analysis with linked data: problems and possible solutions," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 75(1), pages 19-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseph Staudt & Yifang Wei & Lisa Singh & Shawn Klimek & J. Bradford Jensen & Andrew Baer, 2019. "Automating Response Evaluation for Franchising Questions on the 2017 Economic Census," NBER Chapters, in: Big Data for Twenty-First-Century Economic Statistics, pages 209-227, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Fariha Kamal & Wei Ouyang, 2020. "Identifying U.S. Merchandise Traders: Integrating Customs Transactions with Business Administrative Data," Working Papers 20-28, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    3. John Cuffe & Sudip Bhattacharjee & Ugochukwu Etudo & Justin C. Smith & Nevada Basdeo & Nathaniel Burbank & Shawn R. Roberts, 2019. "Using Public Data to Generate Industrial Classification Codes," NBER Chapters, in: Big Data for Twenty-First-Century Economic Statistics, pages 229-246, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John M. Abowd & Joelle Abramowitz & Margaret C. Levenstein & Kristin McCue & Dhiren Patki & Trivellore Raghunathan & Ann M. Rodgers & Matthew D. Shapiro & Nada Wasi, 2019. "Optimal Probabilistic Record Linkage: Best Practice for Linking Employers in Survey and Administrative Data," Working Papers 19-08, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:18-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dawn Anderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.