IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/tnotes/26-46.html

Coding 2020 Census Race Write-Ins by Line and Checkbox: Evidence from Linked 2000, 2010, and 2020 Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Bisty Perlman
  • Joseph Staudt
  • Sooa Ahn

Abstract

The 2020 Census asked respondents who checked White or Black to write in more detail about their race, leading a large population to newly report detailed origin information. This new information led to an openness to interpretation that had previously been limited to a small number of respondents and by less response freedom. The same write-in can mean different things depending on context (the line it is written on and the boxes checked with it): "English" written on the Black line may indicate a White respondent who did not pay attention to line placement, or a Black respondent from the UK. This note describes programs that examine each combination of checked boxes, race line choice, and write-in code, asking how the people who gave those responses' race was reported in previous censuses. We use that history along with our judgment about changing racial identification patterns to propose coding rules that map a checkbox pattern, write-in location, and write-in content to an edited race, and to propose additional codes for patterns the current code list does not represent.

Suggested Citation

  • Bisty Perlman & Joseph Staudt & Sooa Ahn, 2026. "Coding 2020 Census Race Write-Ins by Line and Checkbox: Evidence from Linked 2000, 2010, and 2020 Responses," CES Technical Notes Series 26-46, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Handle: RePEc:cen:tnotes:26-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/ces/tn/CES-TN-2026-46.pdf
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: CES Technical Notes may contain confidential data and, thereby, disclosure is prohibited. Researchers on approved projects (to apply for access, please see https://www.census.gov/ces/rdcresearch/howtoapply.html) with the correct permissions can request full text notes from CES.Technical.Notes.List@census.gov.

    File URL: https://www.census.gov/about/adrm/ced/apply-for-access.html?CES-TN-2026-46
    File Function: Confidential main document
    Download Restriction: Researchers need to have obtained appropriate permissions.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:tnotes:26-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danielle H. Sandler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.