IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/tnotes/22-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Effects of Firm Incentives and Improvements in Census Bureau Sampling Weights

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Hyman

Abstract

Aggregate census estimates that measure the annual economic performance of U.S. industries, such as the Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM) and the Service Annual Survey (SAS), depend critically on the accuracy of quinquennial Census sampling weights (drawn every 5 years). While establishments with larger revenue have historically been sampled with higher probability (weight) to generate national estimates, many “modern service industries†are characterized by shorter lived establishments (whose birth and death may occur between censuses), and opaque parent-subsidiary connections in which revenue can be passed through from subsidiary to parent despite significant employment at the subsidiary location. Both problems potentially bias sampling weights; to the extent that industries are increasingly moving toward these modern structures, biases may be amplified in the most recent years. In this memorandum, we show that the motion picture industry is one segment of the economy in which these features are ubiquitous, and that this structure is generalizable to other sizable industries. To illustrate this problem, we consider the California film industry as a representative “treatment†group, and compare it to the manufacturing industry in California as a more typical “control†group industry with more traditional industry micro-structure. We can consider manufacturing as a control group because the locations of the investment and economic activity are easily measured due to the substantial physical footprint required in the industry. Manufacturing companies are often structured as single-unit plants, and their life cycle often lasts for decades. We perform the comparison between the film and manufacturing industries by matching two detailed user-provided sources of data on the universe of applicants to receive state tax credits in California, to the BR/SSEL, LBD, ASM, and SAS. These are the California Film Commission (CFC) tax credit lottery for the film industry, and the California Competes Tax Credit (CCTC) allocation formula, which is mostly comprised of manufacturing plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Hyman, 2022. "The Economic Effects of Firm Incentives and Improvements in Census Bureau Sampling Weights," CES Technical Notes Series 22-04, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
  • Handle: RePEc:cen:tnotes:22-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/ces/tn/CES-TN-2022-04.pdf
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: CES Technical Notes may contain confidential data and, thereby, disclosure is prohibited. Researchers on approved projects (to apply for access, please see https://www.census.gov/ces/rdcresearch/howtoapply.html) with the correct permissions can request full text notes from CES.Technical.Notes.List@census.gov.

    File URL: https://www.census.gov/about/adrm/ced/apply-for-access.html?CES-TN-2022-04
    File Function: Confidential main document
    Download Restriction: Researchers need to have obtained appropriate permissions.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BR/SSEL (CBPBR); LBD; ASM; SAS;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:tnotes:22-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danielle H. Sandler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.