IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/cpaper/2017-08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Correctional Facility and Inmate Locations: Urban and Rural Status Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Sonya R. Porter
  • John L. Voorheis
  • William Sabol

Abstract

As the incarcerated population grew from the 1980s through the late 2000s, so too did the number of correctional facilities. An increasing number of these facilities have been constructed in rural areas. While research has shown there has been growth in prisons and prisoners in rural areas, there are no recent national-level statistics regarding the urban-rural status of correctional facilities and inmates, the urban-rural status of inmates prior to prison, or an accounting of how many inmates from urban or rural areas are incarcerated in urban and rural facilities. Using 2010 decennial census and Bureau of Justice Statistics’ 2004 Survey of Prison Inmates data we describe these patterns. We find that a disproportionate share of prisons and inmates are located in rural areas, while a disproportionate share of inmates are from urban areas. Our research could inform discussions about the potential consequences of Census Bureau residence criteria for inmates.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonya R. Porter & John L. Voorheis & William Sabol, 2017. "Correctional Facility and Inmate Locations: Urban and Rural Status Patterns," CARRA Working Papers 2017-08, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    • Handle: RePEc:cen:cpaper:2017-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2017/adrm/carra-wp-2017-08.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:cpaper:2017-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dawn Anderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.