IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cem/doctra/888.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can dollarization mitigate the macroeconomic cost of populism? Lessons from Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolás Cachanosky
  • Emilio Ocampo
  • John D. Gibson

Abstract

The dollarization debate can be summarized as a trade-off between credibility and flexibility. Argentina is again at its center. Its traumatic exit from a currency board regime in January 2002 convinced many academics that flexibility was more important than credibility. However, its experience since then shows that flexibility in the hands of populist governments can lead to disastrous results. In this paper we employ a variety of statistical techniques to attempt to verify the empirical validity of the hypothesis that dollarization can significantly reduce the macroeconomic cost of left-wing populism. We focus our analysis on Argentina (non-dollarized populism) and Ecuador (dollarized populism). We find that, in terms of real GDP per capita, populism was less costly in Ecuador than in Argentina.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolás Cachanosky & Emilio Ocampo & John D. Gibson, 2024. "Can dollarization mitigate the macroeconomic cost of populism? Lessons from Latin America," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 888, Universidad del CEMA.
  • Handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/sites/default/files/2024-12/dt888.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E42 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Monetary Sytsems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System
    • E50 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucila Solla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.