IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cee/wpcepe/09-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using a Choice Experiment to Estimate the Benefits of a Reduction of Externalities in Urban Areas with Special Focus on Electrosmog

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Banfi

    (Center for Energy Policy and Economics CEPE, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Massimo Filippini

    (Center for Energy Policy and Economics CEPE, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Andrea Horehájová

    (Center for Energy Policy and Economics CEPE, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Noise, air pollution and electromagnetic pollution (i.e. non-ionizing radiation, also called electrosmog) are typical negative local externalities in urban areas. They are side-effects of human and economic activity (e.g. road transport, telecommunication) and affect individuals’ well-being negatively without compensation. Measurements carried out in 2005 and 2006 show that in several Swiss cities the limit values of air pollution fixed in the Swiss law have often been exceeded. Moreover, in several areas of these cities also the day and night standards for the noise level were violated. Further, the increased number of mobile phone antennas in residential areas, and thus the increased intensity of radiated power, has, in recent years, aroused public concern, discussions and protests. The view of an antenna is annoying an increasing number of inhabitants. In order to solve these problems, policy-makers have to introduce new environmental instruments to improve the quality of the environment in the Swiss cities. This paper aims at giving policy-makers information on benefits generated by an improvement of local environmental quality. In two Swiss cities (Lugano and Zurich), stated choice experiment is used to estimate the benefits of a reduction of the level of the negative externalities mentioned above. Results from this choice experiment reveal that there is a positive and significant willingness to pay (WTP) for a reduction of the level of air pollution and noise to those limit values fixed by the government. In addition, this is the first study that uses a stated preference approach based on a choice experiment for the estimation of the benefit of a reduction of electrosmog.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Banfi & Massimo Filippini & Andrea Horehájová, 2007. "Using a Choice Experiment to Estimate the Benefits of a Reduction of Externalities in Urban Areas with Special Focus on Electrosmog," CEPE Working paper series 09-58, CEPE Center for Energy Policy and Economics, ETH Zurich.
  • Handle: RePEc:cee:wpcepe:09-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepe.ethz.ch/publications/workingPapers/CEPE_WP58.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    choice experiment; electrosmog; noise; air pollution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • R21 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Housing Demand

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cee:wpcepe:09-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carlos Ordas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepetch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.