IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdp/texdis/td701.html

The competition between Korea, China and the USA in Latin American markets: an analysis based on comparative advantages matrices

Author

Listed:
  • Gilberto Libânio

    (Cedeplar/UFMG)

  • Leonardo Ribeiro

    (Cedeplar/UFMG)

  • Diana Chaib

    (Cedeplar/UFMG)

Abstract

This article analyzes the competitive positioning of South Korea, China, and the United States in Latin American markets between 2000 and 2024, aiming to identify Korean export opportunities and examine their relationship with competitors’ specialization. The analysis uses UN Comtrade data and comparative advantage matrices calculated for HS-5 products across five subperiods. The results reveal a transformation in the region’s competitive structure, with the United States remaining the most diversified supplier and China consolidating its position across a broad range of manufactured goods and industrial inputs. South Korea, in contrast, exhibits a more concentrated specialization in industrial niches and technologically sophisticated products. The findings suggest that Korea’s opportunities for export expansion are selective and concentrated in sectors such as machinery, transport equipment, measurement instruments, specialized components, and other technology-intensive manufactured goods. These results point to the importance of targeted export promotion strategies focused on technological capabilities, product differentiation, and specialized industrial segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilberto Libânio & Leonardo Ribeiro & Diana Chaib, 2026. "The competition between Korea, China and the USA in Latin American markets: an analysis based on comparative advantages matrices," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 701, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/pesquisas/td/TD%20701.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diretoria Cedeplar/FACE/UFMG (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.