Valuing Time and Reliability: Commuters' Mode Choice from a Real Time Congestion Pricing Experiment
The valuation of travel time savings has been an important theme in transportation research because it is the single largest contributor to the benefits of many transportation projects. It also plays a central role in deciding about the size and scope of public investment and has important welfare implications. It can shed important light as to whether any congestion pricing scheme will have increase social welfare or not. And help us understand how commuters make their travel decisions. The San Diego I-15 Congestion Pricing Project (SDCPP) is a demonstration project where an existing High Occupancy Vehicle lane has converted to HOT (High Occupancy/Toll) lane. Beginning in 1996 these lanes were made available to solo drivers who pay a toll. The toll adjusts every six minutes to maintain free flowing traffic on the HOT lane. Carpoolers get to use the lane for free as before. This presents us with a unique opportunity to study commutersâ€™ choice between a tolled and a free alternative based on not only what the commuters say they would do (SP), but also on what they actually did (RP). The general result is that this tolled facility is used by high income, middle aged, homeowners, female commuters. An interesting result that comes out of this analysis is the dual effects of toll. If the actual toll rises above the mean toll then the commuter is more likely to take the FasTrak lane. Another interesting implication that the effect of toll is conditional on the level of uncertainty of travel time and conversely uncertainty in travel time encourages use of FasTrak lane only if toll rises above a threshold value. Commuters are more sensitive to variations in travel time in the morning, specially during the peak, than in the afternoon. Another salient result is that the Value of Time estimates from Stated Preference models are significantly lower than the Revealed Preference estimates. The difference is consistent and persistent across the different models which lead to the conclusion that these differences are real. Probably it reflects the difference in responses of individuals to actual and hypothetical situations.
|Date of creation:||01 Jan 2001|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 109 McLaughlin Hall, Mail Code 1720, Berkeley, CA 94720-1720|
Web page: http://www.escholarship.org/repec/uctc/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt9fz0z9kq. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.