IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt5nh3w7s8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Science and Uncertainty in Environmental Regulation: Insights from the Evaluation of California's Smog Check Program

Author

Listed:
  • Bedsworth, Louise Wells
  • Kastenberg, William E

Abstract

Environmental decision making is a complex process confounded by technical uncertainty, political pressure, and social interests. New calls for environmental decision-making frameworks emphasize the need for an holistic approach that incorporates technical and non-technical expertise, and participation by all affected and interested parties. In this paper, we analyze the evaluation of an environmental regulatory program to characterize the interaction of science and policy and the processing of uncertainty using concepts from science and technology studies. This demonstrates the influence of institutional goals and commitments on the uptake and use of science and the processing of uncertainty in the regulatory process. We discuss the implications of such analyses on the development of new environmental decision-making frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Bedsworth, Louise Wells & Kastenberg, William E, 2003. "Science and Uncertainty in Environmental Regulation: Insights from the Evaluation of California's Smog Check Program," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5nh3w7s8, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt5nh3w7s8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5nh3w7s8.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt5nh3w7s8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.