IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt92r8f3xr.html

Safety Assessment of Uncontrolled Intersections Using Both Conflict Probability and Severity

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Yingying
  • Qin, Xiaoran
  • Grembek, Offer
  • Chan, Zhiwei

Abstract

This paper presents a method to assess the safety of uncontrolled intersections considering both conflict probability and severity, which are two major properties of traffic conflicts. This method provides not only the safety level of the entire intersection but also the distribution of safety within intersections. Intersections are modelled by a two-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system and the internal space of intersections is divided into cells. Firstly, vehicle movement characteristics of at uncontrolled intersections are modelled. Secondly, conflict probability of each cell within the intersection is estimated considering approaching probability and lateral migration probability of vehicles. The quantification of conflict severity is based on kinetic energy loss of potential crashes. Grey cluster analysis is used to combine conflict probability and severity to model the safety assessment of each cell. Thirdly, the application of this method discussed, and an overall safety index of intersections is proposed considering weighted safety level and relative value of area with different safety levels. Finally, a case study, which includes three different designs, is presented along with visualization technique to demonstrate the results. The results not only show the validity of the model, but also indicate that the proposed method can be applied for: i) safety evaluation of existing or designed intersections; ii) dangerous position management within intersections; iii) safety assessment of designed intersections and iv) safety level comparison among different intersections or various designs for the same intersection. Using this method, engineers and planners can better evaluate and improve the safety of existing or the future uncontrolled intersections. The future work will use this approach to develop the models of other types of intersections and different road users.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Yingying & Qin, Xiaoran & Grembek, Offer & Chan, Zhiwei, 2017. "Safety Assessment of Uncontrolled Intersections Using Both Conflict Probability and Severity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt92r8f3xr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt92r8f3xr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/92r8f3xr.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt92r8f3xr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.