IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt81x3f7vt.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Major Failure Events of Automated Highway Systems: Three Scenarios from the Driver’s Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Tsao, H.-S. Jacob
  • Plocher, Thomas A.
  • Zhang, Wei-Bin
  • Shladover, Steven E.

Abstract

Automated Highway Systems (AHS) have the potential for offering large capacity and safety gains without requiring significant amounts of additional right-of-way. Since the general public will be the users of the AHS, human factors must play a pivotal role in the research and development of AVCS technologies and AHS operation. In two companion reports, three attributes critical to AHS human factors were identified and seven scenarios featuring variations in these attributes proposed. To ensure the identification of all major compounding attribute combinations, detailed operational events, from the perspective of the driver, were identified. This paper focuses on failure events, where a failure event is defined to be the occurrence of a functional failure during a normal operational event. After briefly reviewing the seven "first-generation'' scenarios, this report first describes the criteria for selecting the three "second-generation'' scenarios and then reports the selection result. While examining each of the normal operational events identified for the three scenarios, we identify possibly multiple major failure events by assuming the failure of one operational function at a time. Failure events resulting from the failure of multiple operational functions can be inferred. For each failure event, we also define possible failure consequences and possible system responses to resolve the failure event. These second-generation scenarios are selected for studying AHS human factors and are not being advocated by the authors as the better deployment choices among the seven first-generation scenarios, even from the human-factors point-of-view. Similarly, the responses provided for the major failure events are not being advocated as the better ones. Rather, to truly identify human capability in failure/emergency situations and not to rule out possible human abilities prematurely, we tend to stretchthe limit of human capability in the responses. The true human capability is a crucial subject for future investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsao, H.-S. Jacob & Plocher, Thomas A. & Zhang, Wei-Bin & Shladover, Steven E., 1997. "Major Failure Events of Automated Highway Systems: Three Scenarios from the Driver’s Perspective," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt81x3f7vt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt81x3f7vt
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/81x3f7vt.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt81x3f7vt. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.