IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt6f85s2vr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Transit Smart Cards

Author

Listed:
  • Iseki, Hiroyuki PhD
  • Demisch, Alexander
  • Taylor, Brian D. PhD
  • Yoh, Allison C. MA

Abstract

Smart cards are gaining momentum as transit agencies across the country have been implementing them as a fare medium. Smart cards hold the promise of revolutionizing the way riders use transit, and how transit systems operate. But in order to adopt smart cards, transit agencies must purchase new equipment and upgrade their entire fare collection system – a very expensive process. In addition, many of the oft-touted benefits of smart cards are vague, and it is not at all certain if they are worth the high cost of implementation. This study examines how transportation agencies in three metropolitan areas evaluated smart card systems – the only three major transit smart card cost/benefit analysis studies that we found in the U.S. by the date of data collection. In addition to these three studies, we also reviewed other less extensive analyses that only partially address issues associated with the implementation of smart card technologies as transit fare media. In reviewing documents from these analyses, combined with information collected in the previous steps of the research, we found that the analyses are neither consistent with one another nor definitive to provide any systematic evaluation of costs and benefits of smart card deployment. These shortcomings are mainly due to: (1) difficulty of estimating many of the qualitative benefits, such as convenience for transfers and comprehensive regional travel data, (2) a significant variation in quantitative cost estimates among the analyses for unclear reasons, and (3) difficulty in generalizing costs and benefits among cases with the unique organizational structures and particular political issues in different regions. Given a lack of solid information available in the literature, we drew on the relevant studies available to identify the cost and benefit items of smart card media and systems and examine the level of reliability and certainty of information for these items. Then we developed a framework on how a proper transit smart card cost/benefit analysis ought to be conducted. With this proposed framework, we found that individual transit operators and multiple agencies bear the majority of the deployment costs, while transit users and individual operators enjoy most of the smart card benefits. The proposed framework sheds light for more comprehensive cost/benefit analysis to evaluate smart card transit fare systems in the current status of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Iseki, Hiroyuki PhD & Demisch, Alexander & Taylor, Brian D. PhD & Yoh, Allison C. MA, 2008. "Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Transit Smart Cards," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6f85s2vr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt6f85s2vr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6f85s2vr.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iseki, Hiroyuki & Yoh, Allison C. & Taylor, Brian D., 2006. "Survey on Status of Knowledge and Interest of Smartcard Fare Collection Systems Among US Transit Agencies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2j28q7gp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt6f85s2vr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.