IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Assessing the Value of TMCs and Methods to Evaluate the Long Term Effects of ITS: Measuring Congestion, Productivity and Benefi t Flow from Implementation

Listed author(s):
  • Gillen, David
  • Cooper, Douglas
Registered author(s):

    The study carries out an evaluation of TMCs (traffic management centers) using three methodologies; case studies, performance based regressions and time series analysis. The study is an extension of previous work that assessed the contribution of different types of intelligent transportation investments and initiatives. However, this research sought to distinguish the separate contributions of the ITS investments from the synergies of integration under a traffic management center. Secondly, the research investigated the time dimension of benefits where we investigated if there was an 'S' curve effect in which a change in the network due to an ITS investment or the introduction of a TMC lead to benefits distributed over time. The distribution was important to evaluating ITS investments. If one measured the impact of the investment too soon, in the disequilibrium period, it would underestimate the true contribution of the investment or change in process or management strategy. We found the institutions that affect TMC operations with their designation of responsibilities, who can do what, when and where, requires change before the TMC can be an effective addition to the management of the transportation network. TMCs represent an integration of hardware and people and that process and management were most important in ensuring the TMCs had added value. Our performance related regressions used levels and changes in congestion (measured by a congestion index) and changes in VMT for autos and trucks. We found that for auto VMT ramp meters were more important than CMSs in improving the system. This was, more VMT can be obtained from the system, holding congestion constant, with ramp meters. We found that TMCs had no statistical impact on auto VMT. In the case of truck VMT, the results were just the reverse; CMSs appeared to be more important than ramp meters in improving system efficiency when efficiency was measured by extracting more truck VMT from the system, holding congestion constant. As with the auto results, TMCs were not significant in the analysis. The regression using the congestion index found ramp meters appear to be 4 times as effective as CMSs. TMCs as before were not statistically significant in affecting congestion. Overall the model did not have a lot of explanatory power in sorting out the differences in congestion among counties or what the underlying contribution is of ITS relative to investments. But it is evident that among conventional congestion relief measures maintaining infrastructure (roads) is more effective than expanding capacity. It also appears that ramp meters and CMSs, indicators of improved network management are more effective in reducing congestion than are expanding the network.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley in its series Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings with number qt5qb8r8kr.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 01 Sep 2004
    Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5qb8r8kr
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    109 McLaughlin Hall, Mail Code 1720, Berkeley, CA 94720-1720

    Phone: 510-642-3585
    Fax: 510-643-3955
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5qb8r8kr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.