IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt5p81g1nn.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Smart Cards, Slow Deployment: Findings from Interviews with U.S. Transit Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Iseki, Hiroyuki
  • Taylor, Brian D.
  • Yoh, Allison

Abstract

This report summarizes findings from interviews with transit officials at seven agencies in North America about smart card evaluations, expectations, and implementation. As part of the project, “Designing a Policy Framework for a Statewide Transit Smart Card System,” this report was preceded by a literature review of smart card projects and an online survey of transit agencies’ knowledge of and interest in interoperable smart card systems for fare collection. The literature review found a lot of booster-like enthusiasm for smart cards, but few studies that have rigorously evaluated smart card system benefits relative to their costs, nor have they addressed the array of institutional issues that hinder implementation. Our survey revealed that many transit agencies are in the process of considering or have already adopted smart card systems, often without clear or certain information about the costs of these systems. Prior to forming collaborations with other agencies, surveyed agency officials tended to underestimate the difficulty of multi-agency partnerships. Once they entered these collaborations, however, agency officials tended to cite multi-agency agreement as the most significant barrier, more difficult to overcome than the financial costs of the systems. Interviews conducted with transit agency officials focused on the decision-making and collaboration processes involved in adopting interoperable smart card systems, and the barriers that they faced. This report documents our findings, and begins first with a description of our interview methods, followed by summaries and highlights of each of the seven smart card projects currently being evaluated or implemented. The case studies include projects in Los Angeles County, the San Francisco Bay Area, Ventura County, Orange County, Santa Barbara County, the Washington Metropolitan Area, and Southeastern Pennsylvania. The report concludes with a summary of issues common to the seven cases, some strategies used in implementing interoperable smart card systems, and a description of next steps of our research.

Suggested Citation

  • Iseki, Hiroyuki & Taylor, Brian D. & Yoh, Allison, 2008. "Smart Cards, Slow Deployment: Findings from Interviews with U.S. Transit Agencies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5p81g1nn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5p81g1nn
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5p81g1nn.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5p81g1nn. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.