IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt5kn520zb.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

San Francisco PedSafe II Project Outcomes and Lessons Learned

Author

Listed:
  • Hua, Jenna
  • Gutierrez, Nicolas
  • Banerjee, Ipsita
  • Markowitz, Frank
  • Ragland, David R

Abstract

This paper presents the project outcomes and lessons learned from the San Francisco PedSafe, a comprehensive pedestrian safety planning and engineering project funded by the Federal Highway Administration. It assesses the effectiveness of the Phase I pedestrian safety plan targeted to higher-injury areas by evaluating the Phase II implementation of a range of mostly low-to-moderate-cost innovative safety improvements. A total of 13 countermeasures (comprised of nine general engineering countermeasures and four Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) countermeasures) were implemented by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) and evaluated by the University of California- Berkeley, Traffic Safety Center (TSC) in a three-year period (2004-2007). Regarding the effectiveness of the 13 countermeasures, six were considered generally successful; three were considered less successful and four were considered inconclusive. The six most successful countermeasures included: flashing beacons (with automated and push button actuation), in- street pedestrian signs, video detection to adjust signal timing, pedestrian head starts (leading pedestrian intervals), portable changeable message speed limit signs, and “Turning Traffic Must Yield to Pedestrians” signs A summary of countermeasure evaluation result highlights is also reported. This paper describes the methodology of countermeasure evaluation, including video data, tools used in data analysis, the advantages and limitations of this method, and possible improvements. In addition, general lessons learned of countermeasure implementation, as well as recommendations for further research are also described.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua, Jenna & Gutierrez, Nicolas & Banerjee, Ipsita & Markowitz, Frank & Ragland, David R, 2009. "San Francisco PedSafe II Project Outcomes and Lessons Learned," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5kn520zb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5kn520zb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5kn520zb.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banerjee, Ipsita & Ragland, David R., 2007. "Evaluation of Countermeasures: A Study on the Effect of Impactable Yield Signs Installed at Intersections in San Francisco," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt61k2k9bz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Ragland, David R & Markowitz, Frank & MacLeod, Kara E, 2003. "An Intensive Pedestrian Safety Engineering Study Using Computerized Crash Analysis," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt871767fh, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banerjee, Ipsita & Ragland, David R., 2007. "Evaluation of Countermeasures: A Study on the Effect of Impactable Yield Signs Installed at Intersections in San Francisco," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt61k2k9bz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; safeTREC;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5kn520zb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.