IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt4mx3c4z5.html

After Study for the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge (Phase II)

Author

Listed:
  • Dion, Francois PhD
  • Harrington, Michelle
  • Hammond, Lisa
  • Butler, Joe
  • Seeherman, Joshua PhD

Abstract

This report evaluates the impacts associated with the following pilot changes that were made on and around the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge: (1) opening to traffic of the eastbound shoulder on the bridge’s lower deck between 2 PM and 7 PM every day (April 2018); (2) conversion of the westbound shoulder on the upper deck into a barrier-separated bike/pedestrian path (November 2019); and (3) conversion of an existing one-way bicycle path on the I-580 West Sir Francis Drake off-ramp overcrossing into a barrier-separated two-way path. Specific evaluations include the level of use by cyclists and pedestrians, impacts on traffic conditions and vehicle emissions, traffic compliance with the eastbound shoulder open/close periods, impacts on incident frequency, types, severity, and clearance times, and impacts on maintenance activities. These elements are to be used by Caltrans to determine whether the changes should be kept, in whole or in part. Evaluations show that the opening of the eastbound shoulder to traffic has significantly reduced travel times and incidents in Marin County through the elimination of the congestion that used to affect the I-580 East approach. While the addition of the path on the upper deck has slightly decreased peak bridge capacity and increased travel time variability on the Richmond approach, congestion on the approach remains close to historical averages. Bicycle traffic on the bridge path is highest on weekends, with an average of 483 cyclists entering the bridge on Saturdays and 355 on Sundays. Weekday traffic is much lower, at around 90 trips per day. Pedestrian traffic is usually very low, at less than 25 individuals per day. Some slight impacts from the addition of the path were also found on incident response and maintenance activities, but no significant impacts on incidents. A user survey further shows a positive perception of the path by cyclists, but a more negative view from motorists. The use of the modified path on the Sir Francis Drake overcrossing seems to mirror the use of the bridge path.

Suggested Citation

  • Dion, Francois PhD & Harrington, Michelle & Hammond, Lisa & Butler, Joe & Seeherman, Joshua PhD, 2024. "After Study for the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge (Phase II)," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4mx3c4z5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt4mx3c4z5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4mx3c4z5.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt4mx3c4z5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.