IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt2tf101rk.html

Balancing Safety and Equity in Traffic Enforcement: An Analysis of Automated Speed Enforcement in Oakland

Author

Listed:
  • Bernal, Declan
  • Horiike, Alisa
  • Mills, Jackson

Abstract

This report evaluates Oakland’s speed camera pilot through a safety and equity lens, using a thorough academic literature review, descriptive analysis of Oakland Police Department stop data, spatial analysis of speeding-related crashes, regression models, and comparative case studies from San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Portland, Oregon. Findings show that officer-based traffic enforcement has deeply declined since 2020, leaving a large gap in traffic enforcement that automated cameras appear to be positioned to fill. Spatial analysis shows that speeding-related crashes are highly concentrated along major corridors in East Oakland and Hispanic/Latino communities experience higher exposure to the effects of speeding. Additionally, road width and speeding appear to have a very strong relationship, especially on Hegenberger Road. Our regression analyses indicate that camera placement is strongly associated with crashes, rather than race, income, or age alone—suggesting that Oakland’s implementation is largely data-driven. Our comparative case studies further demonstrate that automated speed enforcement can substantially reduce speeding across different U.S. municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernal, Declan & Horiike, Alisa & Mills, Jackson, 2025. "Balancing Safety and Equity in Traffic Enforcement: An Analysis of Automated Speed Enforcement in Oakland," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2tf101rk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt2tf101rk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2tf101rk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt2tf101rk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.