Author
Abstract
Carbonation of cement-stabilized layers under concrete pavements in California was investigated as a potential reason for faulting of these pavements. In discussions with personnel from the Pavement Research Center, it was mentioned that a layer of loose material is often observed between the concrete slab and the supporting cement stabilized layer. Samples of materials commonly used under concrete slabs were sent to South Africa for durability testing using South African test methods. These test methods were primarily developed at the CSIR, Transportek, for the purpose of durability assessment of stabilized materials. The materials supplied by Caltrans consisted of samples of two aggregates used to make cement treated base (CTB) and lean concrete base (LCB). The aggregate sources for these materials were, named Mission Valley and Lake Herman. Details of gradings, water content, and cement content were provided with the samples. These materials were tested for durability using the Initial Consumption of Cement test (ICC), the mechanical and hand wet/dry brushing test, the erosion test, and the uncarbonated and carbonated unconfined compressive strength test (UCS). The test results were evaluated according to South African experience using these techniques and South African standards. Two compaction energy levels were also used to determine whether the density to which the materials were compacted had an effect on durability. Most of the specimens passed the test criteria at both compaction energy levels, suggesting that the amounts of cement used are excessive and may be reduced, thus creating the potential for cost saving in terms of cement costs. However, the erosion test indicated that at the lower compaction energy, the CTB materials are probably erodible under concrete slabs. This tendency toward erosion may be overcome by compacting the materials to higher densities.It is recommended that the in-service materials be compacted to higher densities and that further testing be done to determine the appropriate cement contents. The cement contents used here were those specified by Caltrans. A further recommendation is that site investigations be undertaken to enhance the knowledge gained from laboratory testing as the effects of other factors affecting layer performance such as drainage, poor compaction, material deficiencies, etc., can only be observed in-situ. The possibility of mechanical crushing of the cement-stabilized layer should also be investigated.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt91n0g02n. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.