IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt8f74525x.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reflective Cracking Study: First-level Report on HVS Testing on Section 587RF - 45 mm RAC-G Overlay

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, R
  • Jones, David
  • Harvey, John T

Abstract

This report is the third in a series of first-level analysis reports that describe the results of HVS testing on a full-scale experiment being performed at the Richmond Field Station (RFS) to validate Caltrans overlay strategies for the rehabilitation of cracked asphalt concrete. It describes the results of the third HVS reflective cracking testing section, designated 587RF, carried out on a 45 mm half-thickness RAC-G overlay, which was included as a control for performance comparison purposes. The test forms part of Partnered Pavement Research Center Strategic Plan Item 4.10: “Development of Improved Rehabilitation Designs for Reflective Cracking”. HVS trafficking on the section commenced on March 15, 2005 and was completed on October 10, 2005. A total of 2,024,793 load repetitions, equating to 66 million ESALs and a Traffic Index of 15, was applied during this period. A temperature chamber was used to maintain the pavement temperature at 20°C±4°C for the first one million repetitions, then at 15°C±4°C for the remainder of the test. A dual tire (720 kPa pressure) and bidirectional loading with lateral wander configuration was used. Findings and observations based on the data collected during this HVS study include: • On completion of testing, the surface crack density was 3.6 m/m2. Cracking on the overlay was predominantly transverse, as was that on the underlying layer. The crack patterns of the two layers did not match exactly; however, the areas of most severe cracking corresponded. • The average maximum rut depth across the entire test section at the end of the test was 18.2 mm. The rate of rutting was relatively slow during the early part of the experiment, but increased significantly after the 100 kN load change, despite reducing the pavement temperature to 15°C±4°C. • Both of the failure criterion set for the experiment were reached within 100,000 load repetitions of each other. • Ratios of final-to-initial elastic deflections show that damage had increased significantly at all depths in the pavement structure by the end of trafficking, with loss of stiffness highest in the area of most severe cracking in the underlying layer. • Analysis of surface profile and in-depth permanent deformation measurements indicate that most of the permanent deformation occurred in the asphalt-bound surfacing layers (overlay and cracked DGAC) with approximately twice as much damage occurring in the area of most severe cracking in the underlying DGAC layer. Permanent deformation was also recorded in the upper part of the aggregate base in this area. Negligible deformation was recorded in the subgrade. No recommendations as to the use of the modified binders in overlay mixes are made at this time. These recommendations will be included in the second-level analysis report, which will be prepared and submitted on completion of all HVS and laboratory testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, R & Jones, David & Harvey, John T, 2008. "Reflective Cracking Study: First-level Report on HVS Testing on Section 587RF - 45 mm RAC-G Overlay," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8f74525x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8f74525x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8f74525x.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UCPRC-RR-2006-06; Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8f74525x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.