IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt887797rr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reflective Cracking Study: First-Level Report on Laboratory Fatigue Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Tsai, Bor-Wen
  • Jones, David
  • Harvey, John T
  • Monismith, Carl L.

Abstract

This report contains a summary of the laboratory fatigue tests on mixes used as overlays on the Reflective Cracking Study Test Track at the Richmond Field Station. Evaluation of the results of the laboratory study on fatigue response of the overlay mixes reported herein included the effects of mix temperatures, air-void content, aging, mixing and compaction conditions, aggregate gradation, and time of loading. Five binders were assessed, namely AR4000, asphalt rubber (Type G), and three modified binders, termed MB4, MB15, and MAC15. A full factorial considering all the variables required a total of 1,440 tests. This was reduced to 172 tests to accommodate time and fund constraints. Based on the fatigue test results for the mixes used in the overlay experiment, mix rankings for initial stiffness and fatigue life are, from highest to lowest, as follows: Initial stiffness Fatigue life AR4000-D MB4-G RAC-G MB15-G and MAC15-G MAC15-G RAC-G MB4-G and MB15-G AR4000-D Until a range of pavement types and environments are evaluated in the 2nd Level Analysis, only a general indication of the relative performance of the modified binders can be deduced. It would appear that the MB4, MB15, and MAC15 binders used in gap-graded mixes as overlays on existing cracked asphalt concrete pavements should provide comparable lives (at least) to RAC-G mixes when used in comparable thicknesses in thin layers (less than about 60 mm). Recommendations for the use of MB4, MB15 and MAC15 binders in thicker layers and as densegraded mixes await the results of the shear test results and pavement performance analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsai, Bor-Wen & Jones, David & Harvey, John T & Monismith, Carl L., 2008. "Reflective Cracking Study: First-Level Report on Laboratory Fatigue Testing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt887797rr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt887797rr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/887797rr.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UCPRC-RR-2006-08; Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt887797rr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.