IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt7g77p8hp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Results of the 2016-17 Campus Travel Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Heckathorn, Drew

Abstract

The UC Davis Campus Travel Survey is a joint effort by the Transportation & Parking Services (TAPS) and the National Center for Sustainable Transportation, part of the Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Davis. Since 2007 the survey has been administered each fall by a graduate student at the Institute of Transportation Studies. The main purpose of the survey is to collect annual data on how the UC Davis community travels to campus, including mode choice, vehicle occupancy, distances traveled, and carbon emissions. Over the past ten years, the travel survey results have been used to assess awareness and utilization of campus transportation services and estimate demand for new services designed to promote sustainable commuting at UC Davis. Data from the campus travel survey have also provided researchers with valuable insights about the effects of attitudes and perceptions of mobility options on commute mode choice. This year’s survey is the tenth administration of the campus travel survey. The 2016-17 survey was administered online in October and November 2016, distributed by email to a stratified random sample of 24,029 students, faculty, and staff (out of an estimated total population of 45,380). About 19 percent (4,448 individuals) of those contacted responded to this year’s survey, with 16.1 percent actually completing it. For the statistics presented throughout this report, we weight the responses by role (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, Master’s student, PhD student, faculty, and staff) and gender so that the proportion of respondents in each group reflects their proportion in the campus population. The weighting methodology depends on an accurate estimate of the campus population by role and gender. For the 2016-17 survey, campus administrators used a new protocol to estimate faculty and staff population for the campus. The new protocol produced a higher estimate of the number of staff and a lower estimate of the number of faculty in 2016-17 than in 2015-16, meaning that the responses of staff are given more weight and those of faculty less weight in this year’s results (see Appendix H: Weighting by role and gender” for more information). This change in protocol affects the comparison of 2016-17 results to 2015-16 results, and the comparisons presented below may not accurately reflect the true changes in travel to campus. The 2017-18 survey will use the new protocol and will thus provide a more accurate estimate of changes from 2016-2017 to 2017-18.

Suggested Citation

  • Heckathorn, Drew, 2017. "Results of the 2016-17 Campus Travel Survey," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7g77p8hp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7g77p8hp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7g77p8hp.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7g77p8hp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.