IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt5k72q2j0.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Dock-based and Dockless Bikesharing Systems Provide Equitable Access for Disadvantaged Communities?

Author

Listed:
  • Qian, Xiaodong
  • Jaller, Miguel

Abstract

Bikeshare is an increasingly prevalent transportation option that offers users access to a bicycle without owning it. Both dockbased (requiring users to return bicycles to a fixed station) and dockless (free-floating) services have grown significantly over the past decade. Previous research has found that a well-designed bikeshare system has great potential to improve accessibility for disadvantaged communities. However, systems currently underserve these communities. Moreover, there is a lack of research about the performance and impacts of dock-based versus dockless bikeshare systems in terms of providing equitable access to disadvantaged communities. Researchers at the University of California, Davis analyzed the difference in service levels among dock-based and dockless systems in the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles. The researchers analyzed the spatial distribution of service areas, availability of bikes and bike idle times, trip statistics, rebalancing, and other metrics to understand how well or poorly these systems serve designated “communities of concern” (CoCs). Finally, using crowdsourced suggestions from online platforms, the researchers conducted a comparative assessment of actual station locations with the users’ suggestions of potential station locations. These analyses can help planning agencies and local governments to better understand and manage these systems. This policy brief summarizes the findings from that research and provides policy implications. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Qian, Xiaodong & Jaller, Miguel, 2022. "Do Dock-based and Dockless Bikesharing Systems Provide Equitable Access for Disadvantaged Communities?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5k72q2j0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt5k72q2j0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5k72q2j0.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Bicycles; Equity (Justice); Spatial analysis; Transportation disadvantaged persons; Vehicle sharing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt5k72q2j0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.