IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt4pp80768.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Opportunities for Local Governments: A Quantification and Prioritization Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Kendall, Alissa
  • Harvey, John
  • Butt, Ali A.
  • Lozano, Mark T.
  • Saboori, Arash
  • Kim, Changmo

Abstract

Local governments have steadily increased their initiative to address global climate change, and many present their proposed strategies through climate action plans (CAPs). This study conducts a literature review on current local approaches to greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction strategies by assessing CAPs in California and presents common strategies in the transportation sector along with useful tools. One identified limitation of many CAPs is the omission of quantitative economic cost and emissions data for decision-making on the basis of cost-effectiveness. Therefore, this study proposes a framework for comparing strategies based on their life cycle emissions mitigation potential and costs. The results data can be presented in a marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) to allow for side-by-side comparison of considered strategies. Researchers partnered with Yolo and Unincorporated Los Angeles Counties to analyze 7 strategies in the transportation and energy sectors (five and two, respectively). A MACC was subsequently developed for each county. Applying the life cycle approach revealed strategies that had net cost savings over their life cycle, indicating there are opportunities for reducing emissions and costs. The MACC also revealed that some emissions reduction strategies in fact increased emissions on a life cycle basis. Applying the MACC framework to two case study jurisdictions illustrated both the feasibility and challenges of including quantitative analysis in their decision-making process. An additional barrier to using the MACC framework in the context of CAPs, is the mismatch between a life cycle and annual accounting basis for GHG emissions. Future work could explore more efficient data collection, alternative scopes of emissions for reporting, and environmental justice concerns. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Kendall, Alissa & Harvey, John & Butt, Ali A. & Lozano, Mark T. & Saboori, Arash & Kim, Changmo, 2020. "Greenhouse Gas Reduction Opportunities for Local Governments: A Quantification and Prioritization Framework," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4pp80768, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4pp80768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4pp80768.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; Law; Climate change; Decision making; Greenhouse gases; Life cycle analysis; Local government agencies; Performance measurement; Transportation planning;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4pp80768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.