IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt490159fh.html

Comparative Analysis of Global Transportation/Energy Models: Methodologies, Scenarios and Policy Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Rui
  • Fulton, Lewis

Abstract

This paper compares global transportation/energy models in terms of scope, structure and the types of scenarios that have been developed, with particular emphasis on projections of low-carbon fuels like hydrogen, biofuels, e-fuels and electricity in transportation decarbonization scenarios. Our review of the models and their scenarios indicates that scenarios with deep CO2 reduction or globally ambitious climate policies tend to show a large increase in the role of electrification, advanced biofuels and in some cases hydrogen in transport energy by 2050 and/or later years. Different transport modes and sectors have different requirements and are projected to adopt different low-carbon fuels. Electricity is projected to play a key role in road and rail, though liquid low-carbon fuels dominate shipping and aviation and are expected to eventually surpass petroleum use. Deep CO2 reduction scenarios tend to assume strong policies that drive reductions. Policies such as efficiency standards, technology requirements, achieving technological innovation, and infrastructure investment are typically important drivers for influencing the adoption and scale-up of low-carbon technologies and fuels across regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Rui & Fulton, Lewis, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Global Transportation/Energy Models: Methodologies, Scenarios and Policy Implications," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt490159fh, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt490159fh
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/490159fh.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt490159fh. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.