IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt1w33s9p5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Traffic Noise and Light May Affect Wildlife Use of Highway Crossing Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Shilling, Fraser

Abstract

Roads and highways act as barriers to wildlife. They disrupt movement of wildlife populations and connectivity between communities of interacting species. Transportation organizations and many wildlife agencies see highway crossing structures for wildlife as critical to mitigating highway barrier effects. These structures are optimistically assumed to be effective for most species, most of the time, but are seldom critically investigated. Wildlife use of highway crossing structures can be highly variable and dependent on structural attributes, human use, and traffic conditions. Studies of animal behavior suggest that wildlife aversion to roadways—and possibly to crossing structures—could be related to traffic noise and light. If transportation organizations and wildlife agencies can confirm this effect they may be able to design more effective wildlife crossing structures and manage existing structures to increase their use by wildlife. This policy brief discusses findings from research that measured traffic noise levels and used camera traps placed at 20 bridges and culverts in California that were known from previous work to pass at least one species. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Shilling, Fraser, 2018. "Traffic Noise and Light May Affect Wildlife Use of Highway Crossing Structures," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1w33s9p5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1w33s9p5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1w33s9p5.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Physical Sciences and Mathematics; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Bridges; Cameras; Culverts; Data collection; Habitat (Ecology); Highways; Street lighting; Traffic noise; Wildlife; Wildlife crossings;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1w33s9p5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.