IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt1k20w849.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Performance Measurement Evaluation Framework and Co-Benefit/Tradeoff Analysis for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) Applications: A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Danyang
  • Wu, Guoyuan
  • Boriboonsomsin, Kanok
  • Barth, Matthew J

Abstract

A number of Connected and/or Automated Vehicle (CAV) applications have recently been designed to improve the performance of our transportation system. Safety, mobility and environmental sustainability are three cornerstone performance metrics when evaluating the benefits of CAV applications. These metrics can be quantified by various measures of effectiveness (MOEs). Most of the existing CAV research assesses the benefits of CAV applications on only one (e.g., safety) or two (e.g., mobility and environment) aspects, without holistically evaluating the interactions among the three types of MOEs. This paper first proposes a broad classification of CAV applications, i.e., vehiclecentric, infrastructure-centric, and traveler-centric. Based on a comprehensive literature review, a number of typical CAV applications have been examined in great detail, where a categorized analysis in terms of MOEs is performed. Finally, several conclusions are drawn, including the identification of influential factors on system performance, and suggested approaches for obtaining co-benefits across different types of MOEs. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Danyang & Wu, Guoyuan & Boriboonsomsin, Kanok & Barth, Matthew J, 2017. "Performance Measurement Evaluation Framework and Co-Benefit/Tradeoff Analysis for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) Applications: A Survey," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1k20w849, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1k20w849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1k20w849.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1k20w849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.