IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt0zw2b8n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sensitivity Analysis of 2002 Design Guide Rigid Pavement Distress Prediction Models

Author

Listed:
  • Kannekanti, Venkata
  • Harvey, John

Abstract

The AASHTO 2002 Design Guide (2002DG) has been calibrated using LTPP sections throughout the nation but with very few sections from the state of California. This created the need to validate the models in 2002DG and recalibrate them if needed so that they may be used for pavement design and rehabilitation in California. In order to validate the design guide, a three-stage process has been identified: bench testing or sensitivity analysis, verification using accelerated pavement testing data, and verification using field data. The study presented in this report includes performing sensitivity analysis of the rigid part of 2002DG. Sensitivity analysis helps to check the reasonableness of the model predictions, to identify problems in the software, and to help understand the level of difficulty involved in obtaining the inputs. The reasonableness of the model predictions is checked by varying key design variables including traffic volume, axle load distribution, climate zone, thickness, shoulder type, joint spacing, load transfer efficiency, PCC strength, base type, and subgrade type. The chosen factorial resulted in approximately 8,500 simulations. The software outputs are transverse cracking, faulting, and IRI. A couple of related sensitivity studies have also been undertaken to study the effect of variables including surface absorptivity and coefficient of thermal expansion, which were not included in the primary sensitivity analysis. Results from all the simulations showed that almost all of the cases produce reasonable values for transverse cracking, faulting, and IRI. The transverse cracking model is sensitive to coefficient of thermal expansion, joint spacing, shoulder type, PCC thickness, and traffic volume. The faulting values are sensitive to dowels, shoulder type, climate zone, PCC thickness and traffic volume. However, there are cases for which model predictions disagree with prevailing knowledge in pavement engineering. This study also revealed some problems associated with the software.

Suggested Citation

  • Kannekanti, Venkata & Harvey, John, 2006. "Sensitivity Analysis of 2002 Design Guide Rigid Pavement Distress Prediction Models," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0zw2b8n4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0zw2b8n4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0zw2b8n4.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. du Plessis, Louw & Jooste, Fritz & Keckwick, Steve & Steyn, Wynand, 2005. "HVS Testing of the Palmdale Test Site, North Tangent Sections: Evaluation of Long Life Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies-Rigid," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8dr8h3hf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saboori, Ashkan & Lea, Jeremy & Harvey, John & Lea, Jon & Mateos, Angel & Wu, Rongzong, 2021. "Pavement ME JPCP Transverse Cracking Model Calibration and Design Catalog Framework (Version 2.5.5)," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt03p4h24f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Engineering;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0zw2b8n4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.