IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt0952f6qx.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reflective Cracking Study: First-Level Report on HVS Testing on Section 590RF - 90 mm MB4-G Overlay

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, David
  • Tsai, Bor-Wen
  • Harvey, John T

Abstract

This report is the first in a series of first-level analysis reports that describe the results of HVS testing on a full-scale experiment being performed at the Richmond Field Station (RFS) to validate Caltrans overlay strategies for the rehabilitation of cracked asphalt concrete. It describes the results of the first HVS reflective cracking testing section, designated 590RF, carried out on a 90-mm full-thickness MB4-G overlay. The test forms part of Partnered Pavement Research Center Strategic Plan Element 4.10: “Development of Improved Rehabilitation Designs for Reflective Cracking.” HVS trafficking on the section commenced on January 13 and was completed on June 16, 2004. A temperature chamber was used to maintain the pavement temperature at 20°C±4°C. A dual tire (720 kPa pressure) and bidirectional loading with lateral wander configuration was used. A total of 1,981,365 load repetitions, equating to 37 million ESALs and a Traffic Index of 14, was applied during this period. Findings and observations based on the data collected during this HVS study include: • No reflective cracking from the underlying severely cracked DGAC layer was observed on the MB4-G overlay after almost two million HVS repetitions. The MB4-G overlay thus appeared to successfully prevent any cracking in the underlying layer from reflecting through to the surface, despite final-to-initial deflections indicating that considerable damage had occurred in the asphalt layers under loading. • The average maximum rut depth across the entire test section at the end of the test was 12.7 mm, equivalent to the Caltrans (and experiment) failure criteria of 12.5 mm. The maximum rut depth measured on the section was 19.0 mm, with a maximum rut depth of 12.5 mm reached after about 1.17 million repetitions, soon after the load increase from 60 to 90 kN. • Ratios of final-to-initial elastic surface deflections under a 60 kN wheel load increased by between 1.9 and 3.0 times along the length of the section. The ratios for in-depth deflections show that damage increased at all depth in the pavement structure (between 1.9 and 2.2 times) by the end of trafficking. Loss of stiffness was highest in the area of most severe cracking in the underlying DGAC layer. • Analysis of surface profile and in-depth permanent deformation measurements indicates that most of the permanent deformation (between 67 [at MDD6] and 88 percent [at MDD10]) occurred in the asphalt-bound surfacing layers (overlay and cracked DGAC) with marginal deformation in the base layer and negligible deformation in the subgrade. No recommendations as to the use of MB4-G mixes are made at this time. These recommendations will be included in the second-level analysis report, which will be prepared and submitted on completion of all HVS and laboratory testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, David & Tsai, Bor-Wen & Harvey, John T, 2008. "Reflective Cracking Study: First-Level Report on HVS Testing on Section 590RF - 90 mm MB4-G Overlay," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0952f6qx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0952f6qx
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0952f6qx.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; UCPRC-RR-2006-04;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0952f6qx. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.