IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/indrel/qt4900f59j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Power of Coalitions: Participation and Governance in California’s Public-Private Welfare State

Author

Listed:
  • Eaton, Charlie
  • Weir, Margaret

Abstract

Between 1980 and 2010 California’s health care policy field shifted from a business-dominated, closed-door pattern of decision making to an open political arena in which a wide-ranging and diversely resourced coalition advocating on behalf of beneficiaries had become an accepted partner in policymaking. This article examines this transformation, considering its broader implications for the political dynamics of the public-private welfare state and the role of advocacy groups in defending beneficiary interests. Our argument emphasizes coalition-building, probing not just which interests combine forces, but also showing how coalitions can expand over time and build their range of capabilities. We focus on three processes that build effective coalitions to influence public private policymaking: 1) an initial link that joins previously unconnected groups in umbrella organizations; 2) resource expansion that enlarges the engaged base by funding more diverse groups and expanding alliances with those organizations; 3) institutionalization of coalitional engagement by changing the rules of the game using such policy levers as regular hearings, provisions for participation, and transparency.  We conclude by showing how these capabilities have positioned California to implement the Affordable Care Act and consider the implications for other states.

Suggested Citation

  • Eaton, Charlie & Weir, Margaret, 2013. "The Power of Coalitions: Participation and Governance in California’s Public-Private Welfare State," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt4900f59j, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt4900f59j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4900f59j.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt4900f59j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/irucbus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.